Saturday, October 20, 2012

Salvation and Sacrifice in the Book of Hebrews


CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

            For believers, the concept of salvation through the blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is familiar and readily accepted.  But, imagine your reaction to this teaching as if you had never heard it before.  It almost sounds mid-evil or mythical.  How does blood clean anything?  Why did it have to be the blood of God’s Son?  How does the sacrifice of Jesus provide salvation?  Hebrews, the nineteenth book of the New Testament, provides the answer to these and many other very intriguing questions regarding Christ’s sacrifice and our salvation.
            Before diving into Hebrews, however, it is important to understand what the Jewish audience of the first century would have already known when they opened this complex and enlightening letter.  This is a key step in the process of establishing a proper hermeneutical framework.[1]  The Jews understood God’s law, His divine wrath against those who broke that law, and the necessity of the sacrificial system to appease that wrath.  Unless you are a first century Jew or educated in biblical history, it is doubtful that you would have such understanding.  This work will seek to bring clarity to these truths in hopes to gain a more complete perspective on mankind’s salvation by divine sacrifice as taught in Hebrews.


CHAPTER 2

A DREADFUL THING



There is a good reason that the Jews of the Old Covenant were sometimes referred to as “God fearers.”  These people were entrusted with the law of God and thus were aware of His expectations for humanity and the consequences for disobedience.   They not only would have understood the need of a sacrifice for salvation, but they would have known from what they needed to be saved.[2]  Today, most believers think we are being saved from sin, hell, or Satan.  But, what power does sin itself actually have?  It is something people do, and though it may have temporal consequences, it itself has no power.   The same is true of hell in that it is only a place.  It does not reach up and grab anyone to pull them into it’s fiery abyss.  Likewise, Satan is a created being whose only power is granted to him by his Creator.  So, from what are we actually being saved?  The writer of Hebrews tells us plainly in chapter ten:

“If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.  Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses.  How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?  For we know him who said, ‘It is mine to avenge; I will repay,’ and again, ‘The Lord will judge his people.’  It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”[3]

Likewise, Paul says, “Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him!”[4]  Clearly we are not merely being saved from sin, hell, or Satan, but from the very wrath of God Himself.  Has this foundational truth been lost in the American church?  Can the modern day believer really grasp the concepts imbedded throughout the work of Hebrews without fully embracing this divine revelation?  Does salvation through sacrifice even make sense without building upon this foundational doctrine?

Sin that so Easily Entangles
A solid doctrinal foundation begins by understanding the biblical concept of sin.  Sin, the act of disobeying God’s law, was understood to be a very serious offense with very serious results.  Today, however, people seem to view sin as much less significant.  Teachings about the fear of God, His holy nature, and His divine justice have been replaced with pithy antidotes and humorous, feel-good stories.  Many have heard of hell and some even affirm its existence, but few actually believe they deserve to go there due to their sin.   They feel that God is just too good to send a ‘decent’ person to a place of eternal torment and separation from God.  Even respected pastors and authors, such as Rob Bell in his most recent book “Love Wins,” suggests an eternal Hell is non-existent.[5]  A.W. Tozer warned of such trends when he wrote, “The vague and tenuous hope that God is too kind to punish the ungodly has become a deadly opiate for the conscience of million.”[6]  Those who deny the eternally severe consequences of hell have yet to accept the biblical doctrines of God’s holiness and justice.
Sin is so serious because God is so holy.  In the human justice system, the seriousness of a crime is measured not only by the inherent nature of the offense, but also by the one who is offended.  For example, siblings caught in a squabble may resort to throwing shoes at each other and the punishment would be relatively small.  But, if a man threw his shoes at the President of the United States, as Muntadhar al-Zaiydi, an Iraqi journalist, did in 2008 he would face up to two years in prison.  The nature of the crime is identical.  Both are merely throwing shoes in anger at another human being, but the punishment is much more sever in the latter case due to the nature and status of the one who is offended. 
Now, if we can readily accept the escalation of punishment in our own judicial system based upon the status and position of the offended party, why are so many tempted to ignore the status and position of God, who clearly is offended by our sin?  Is not God’s nature eternally holy?  Is God’s position as our infinitely holy creator not significant?  If God’s holy nature and status is eternally great, it would bear to reason that an offense against Him would deserve an eternally severe punishment.  Our sins, regardless of how insignificant they may appear, have offended an infinitely glorious and holy God, and the punishment must correspond to that offense.
When the angry journalist offended President Bush many argued that the criminal did not deserve being sent to prison.  In fact, some argued he deserved to be honored for his actions.  This was a direct insult to the President’s nature and status.  By arguing that the shoe-throwing journalist did not deserve that severe of a punishment, they were actually impugning the personhood and status of the President of the United States.  Likewise, those who dismiss the eternally severe punishment of Hell are actually insulting the personhood and status of the God and Creator of our universe, by suggesting those who offend Him do not really deserve that severe of a punishment. 
The first century readers of Hebrews would have understood that any sin against an eternal God must be paid eternally.  An infinite Creator deserves infinite payment for any offense, no matter how small it may appear to us.  There are really only a couple of options to satisfy this demand.  Either a finite being (man) must pay for his offense for an infinite amount of time, or an infinite being (Jesus) must pay for it once and for all time.   
The Jewish readers of Hebrews would have approached the letter understanding this truth and revering God because of it.  They would have known why a blood sacrifice was necessary and thus could better understand the link with Christ’s work on the cross.   The sacrifice of Christ is brought to full light when viewed from the backdrop of Judaism’s sacrificial system, a topic for which the audience of Hebrews would have been experts.[7]

Destined to Die
“Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment.”[8]  For we know him who said, ‘It is mine to avenge; I will repay,’ and again, ‘The Lord will judge his people.’"[9]  Not only have all men sinned and offended the infinite glorious nature of God, but they are destined to die and stand before Him as their judge.  According to scripture, God is a perfect judge who “despises those who acquit the guilty and condemn the innocent.”[10]  So, in addition to being eternally Holy, God is also perfectly just.  In other words, God always judges correctly.  If a man is guilty of sin, as all men are (Romans 3:23), then God must declare him guilty.  If He does not then He would be lying, and we know God cannot lie (Titus 1:2).
This is all very bad news for a world filled with guilty sinners who have offended the infinite holiness of a perfect judge.  And it is only in light of this very bad news that we can begin to appreciate the magnitude of the good news being brought by the author of the letter of Hebrews.  It is also a necessary backdrop to understand the necessity of a perfect sacrifice to accomplish salvation for guilty sinners.
CHAPTER 3
THE NECESSITY OF BLOOD

            "Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins."[11]  During Yom Kipper, the Jewish Day of Atonement, scholars estimate that over 100,000 animals were slaughtered in the various Temples.  The blood would flow and be splashed against the base of the altar.  The carcasses of the animals would be cleaned, carved up and burnt on the altar.  There was so much blood flowing from Jerusalem they had specially built gutters for it to stream out of the city and empty into a brook called Kidron, turning it crimson.  The Temple was a slaughterhouse of sorts.  But, even with all that killing and all that blood, it just was not enough. It was not enough to permanently fix the sin problem and restore us to intimate relationship with our Creator.[12]
From the Garden of Eden the connection between, sin, death, and a substitute to cover the sins of man is well established (Genesis 3:21).  This continued through the time of the patriarchs and was then fully established through Moses (Exodus 12; Lev. 16).  The tenth chapter of Hebrews begins by explaining how the sacrificial system of animals in the Old Covenant “is only a shadow of the good things that are coming” (vs. 1), and that “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins” (vs. 4). Though the act of

animal sacrifice failed to provide atonement in God’s eyes, it is clear that God is the one who instituted the sacrificial system for the forgiveness of sin (Lev. 13). 
No work or obedient act would merit salvation, not even the ritual of animal sacrifice set up by God Himself.  It was never intended to do so.  However, God used the old system to establish two important truths that would need to be understood on some level in order to grasp what was to come. 
One, it served as an annual reminder to the people that they are guilty of sin and in need of atonement.  Though the law was not the remedy for sin, it still served a very good and necessary purpose.  It served as a teacher to inform mankind of their fallen and sinful condition.  The law helped people to understand and accept that they are guilty and that salvation from God’s wrath is their greatest need.
The second truth established by the old system was that it proved the shedding of blood is necessary for the remission of sins (Lev. 17:11).  One must first understand that blood represents life, thus the split blood represents death.  A sacrifice, the spilling of blood, was representative of death, which is the consequence of sin.   If one is to avoid that consequence they must have a substitute.  For many generations that substitute was an animal, such as a lamb, but once the fulfillment of the Old Covenant came as the “Lamb of God” and offered Himself as a sacrifice, the old passed away and the new took its place.  The difference in the sacrifice of Christ is that it was offered once and for all.  There is no longer the need for an annual sacrifice now that Christ’s blood has satisfied the wrath of God once and for all time.[13]
CHAPTER 4
A BETTER SACRIFICE

Leading up to chapter 10 the author has already taught that Christ established a better priesthood (chapter 7), a better covenant (chapter 8), and a better sanctuary (chapter 9).  Now, he is arguing that Christ has also established a better sacrifice.  It is better because the sacrifices of the Mosaic Law were never able to atone for sin.  Jesus came to fulfill the demands of the old covenant, establish a new covenant, a better one, and sacrifice Himself for the salvation of all who believe.  His perfect blood is the only sufficient cover for the believer’s sin.  It is only by the shedding of his innocent blood that believers are made innocent and saved from God’s judgment.[14]
The sacrifice of Christ is also better because it demonstrates how strongly God feels about mankind.  The Old Covenant was based in shame, guilt and fear, but Christ’s sacrifice took on the shame, removed the guilt, and drives out all fear.  This cannot be accomplished for anyone individually without faith in Christ, which is why the author of Hebrews goes to such great lengths to bring the reader to full knowledge of His superiority and love.

Founded on Love
            God’s love is demonstrated through sacrifice in order to provide our salvation.  Christ was not sent to merely live as an example for us to follow, or a teacher from which we are to

learn.  He was sent to be the perfect atoning sacrifice to appease the demands of the law and demonstrate His unconditional love for sinful man.  This sacrifice was not given against his will.  For the one giving himself as a sacrifice said, “Here I am, I have come to do you will.”[15]  Elsewhere he says, “The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life--only to take it up again.  No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again.”[16]   So, the love being demonstrated is evident both in the will of the Father and the Son, working as One to make a sacrifice of love for undeserving people.

Applied through Faith
            “And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.”[17]  After introducing the foundation of gracious love as God’s motive for salvation, the means through which this salvation is applied must now be fully established.  The requirement of faith in God’s gracious provision is established in both the Old and New Testaments.  Hebrews chapter 11 uses the old to establish the new and in doing so introduces for the readers “a great cloud of witnesses” that have gone before us (Heb. 12:1).  These witnesses did not attain righteousness and thus salvation through keeping the law, but instead by faith in the revelation of God.  They trusted God and that alone was credited to their accounts as righteousness.[18] 
            The expectation for faith in God is nothing new.  The Israelites are reprimanded for their lack of faith in God after wondering in the wilderness for forty years (Deut. 1:32; 9:23).  The king of Judah was called on by the prophet Isaiah to believe God’s word (Isaiah 7:9) and the Lord, through Habakkuk, clearly taught, “the righteous will live by his faith” (Hab. 2:4).   It is apparent that the basis of salvation in every generation is faith in God, yet the content of His revelations may be more complete throughout time.  The list of God’s faithful cloud of witnesses in Hebrews chapter 11 do not necessarily have a full understanding of Christ and His atoning work, yet clearly their faith, regardless of how small, was pleasing to God because they “believed he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.”[19]  Righteousness was credited to their account even though the content of their faith was not complete.  Grace is even sufficient for incomplete understanding of God’s redemptive plan and purpose.  Does this mean, however, that one may be saved a part from the atoning work of Christ?  Absolutely not, as it is written, “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”[20]   Though someone such a Rahab may not have understood the prophecies of the One to come, this does not negate the need of that One’s work of atonement for Rahab’s salvation.   She may not have known the name by which she was saved, but she trusted in the God of salvation and it was credited to her as righteousness. 

CHAPTER 5
APPLICATION

            How does this affect the church today?  No Christian would take issue with the author’s claim that God does not desire sacrifice or that the blood of animals cannot remove wrath.  The entire sacrificial system of the Old Covenant is foreign to the modern church, so what would they care about how often sacrifices are to be offered or if they are now declared obsolete?  The questions and concerns of the first century Hebrew are not the same questions and concerns of the typical churchgoer.  However, people today still must deal with their sin and guilt.  People in the twenty-first century may not use animal sacrifice to appease their conscience, but many other similar methods have been adopted by those who have yet to fully trust in the work of Christ on the cross of Calvary. 
            For example, some use moral living to earn God’s favor, which is tantamount to the Pharisaical attempts to earn righteousness through the law.  Morality along with effort of abstinence from certain vices has become the law of the Christian church in the Western culture.  Even church going Christians come to believe that if they can live a decently moral life, which is typically measured in contrast to others, then God will accept them and ultimately save them.  Their moral codes may not be near as complex and demanding as the Levitical system, but they are as equally insufficient to earn salvation.
            Others feel their church attendance or biblical knowledge will suffice.  Their weekly “sacrifice” of attending, giving, and serving at their local congregation is offered up in hopes

to appease God’s anger for their sin.  Learning all about God’s sovereign attributes and applying scripture to memory can become man’s futile attempts to do what only Christ can do.  It is only faith in the God of grace that makes these actions truly bare eternal fruit.  People fall into grave error when they allow such activities and rituals become their own modern day sacrificial system.  Only faith in the “once and for all” sacrifice of Christ will bring ultimate satisfaction and peace with God.  Salvation comes through faith, not rituals.  We are sanctified through relationship, not religion.  The Jews of the first century, who were prone to turn back to their traditions, teach a valuable lesson for the Christian today.[21]




WORKS CITED


Akin, Daniel, Bill Curtis, and Stephen Rummage. Engaging Exposition. Nashville: B&H
Publishing, 2011.

Allen, David L. Hebrews in The New American Commentary. Vol. 35. Nashville: B&H
Publishing Group, 2010.

Bell, Rob. Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever
Lived. New York: HarperCollins, 2011.

Guthrie, George H. Hebrews: From Biblical Text to Contemporary Life, in The NIV
Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.

MacArthur, John. The MacArthur New Testament Commentary: Hebrews. Chicago: Moody
Publishers, 1983.

Morris, Leon. The Expositors Bible Commentary, Vol. 12. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981.

Stedman, Ray. IMP New Testament Commentary Series Part 1, Chapters 1-9.  Downer
Grove Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1992; web page, available from
http://www.raystedman.org/hebrews2/heb2comm1.html; Internet; accessed 2 May 2012.

Tozer, A.W. The Knowledge of the Holy. New York: HarperCollins, 1978.




[1] Daniel Akin, Bill Curtis, and Stephen Rummage, Engaging Exposition (Nashville: B&H Publishing, 2011), 15.

[2] John MacArthur, The MacArthur New Testament Commentary: Hebrews (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 1983), 205.

[3] Hebrews 10:26-31 [NIV].
[4] Romans 5:9 [NIV].

[5] Rob Bell, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived. (New York: HarperCollins, 2011), 82-83.
[6] A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy (New York: HarperCollins, 1978), 89.
[7] Leon Morris, The Expositors Bible Commentary, Vol. 12 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981), 106-108.

[8] Hebrews 9:27 [NIV].

[9] Hebrews 10:30 [NIV].

[10] Proverbs 17:15 [NIV].
[11] Hebrews 9:22 [NIV].

[12] Ray Stedman, IMP New Testament Commentary Series Part 1, Chapters 1-9 (Downer Grove Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 1992), web page, available from http://www.raystedman.org/hebrews2/heb2comm1.html; Internet; accessed 2 May 2012.
[13] David Allen, New American Commentary: Hebrews (B&H Publishing: Nashville, 2010), 614-616.
[14] George H. Guthrie, The NIV Application Commentary: Hebrews (Zondervan: Grand Rapids, 1998), 73.
[15] Hebrews 9:10 [NIV].

[16] John 10:17-18 [NIV].

[17] Hebrews 11:6 [NIV].

[18] David Allen, New American Commentary: Hebrews (B&H Publishing: Nashville, 2010), 360.

[19] Hebrews 11:6 [NIV].

[20] Acts 4:12 [NIV].
[21] Guthrie, 22.

Listen the Podcast HERE